In the years since it was revealed you had meetings with law enforcement you’ve shown increasingly erratic behavior that I think that you need to address for the safety of people around you.
Instead of simply saying that your meetings with law enforcement were a mistake, first you claimed they didn’t happen and that I was lying. Now you claim that it was only the state police. You continue to justify your actions in talking to cops. FYI, it is unacceptable to talk to cops– even if it is only the state police– about movement activities in any form. Here’s a good explanation of why:
Please watch this video. I have linked it several times in relation to you. Please refute the attorney’s points and tell the world why it was okay for you to talk to law enforcement. Years have gone by and it is a little late after so much shilling for you to simply say, “well, it was a bad idea and I won’t do it again– anyone that talks to cops now is a traitor and not welcome around me.” That would be the correct and rational thing to do, and people would accept it– or at least I would. Instead you descend into personal attacks. Why do you do that when confronted with the issue of meetings with law enforcement? Why do you take this as a personal attack on your operations? Why is it integral for you to talk to cops?
Now comes this recent issue of membership lists. Instead of explaining why your lists are good (in response to a post that you weren’t even named in) you go into some insane fugue. The only justification that you air is this:
Some folks wish to lead, wish to make a stand, wish to be more fully vetted by our leadership,
But it’s absolutely obvious you can’t vet with a real name or address. That provides nothing for you. Informants and infiltrators get into organized crime rings which have budgets of $100MM and can threaten people with execution. You think you’re somehow going to do better than them? The only way you can vet people is by growing a metric of trust by their actions over time– which is something that can be done with equal efficacy whether you know them by “Uncle Adolf” or “Joshua Connor Moon”. Why do you need real names to vet people?
Once again, if you have some sort of unique system for telling someone’s intentions just by a short string of text, let the world know, that’s probably something you could make millions off of. If not, you should probably focus on deleting data which you don’t need and shouldn’t retain.
No lists is timeless advice. James Mason said it in SIEGE. Some of SIEGE has not stood up to the test of time, but this advice is even more relevant now in the age of the Internet where you don’t need to make physical mailing lists for people to read your ideas.
It’s weird that the site that is pro-American and just about meme posting is taking security more seriously than the close affiliation of groups who say America is irredeemable and secession or overthrowing the US government is the only real solution. It seems to me it should be the inverse if you were actually making an honest attempting at doing what you claim you are doing. Either you’re not making an honest attempt or you’re not thinking clearly about it.
Finally, your fraudulence reaches its peak in your claims about me. While some of them are publicly debunked already, I will dissect this one:
Furthermore, I am an IT professional who specializes in security, DDOS, and hacking issues. Unlike some self-promoting recent arrivals whose claim to fame is that they got busted with a social engineering “hack,”
Firstly, you are not remotely tangental to the information security industry, which I have interacted with my entire adult life until dedicating myself fulltime to this movement. You have never published a single exploit. I can point to some of mine (CVE-2010-1099) that are not the bug that got me arrested. Furthermore, there was absolutely no social engineering in the bug disclosure that the feds used as pretext to falsely arrest me. It was found entirely by technical analysis– finding the iPad encryption keys on the device, decrypting the caches on the OS and running strings to find the URL in question. You can listen to the prosecutor describe it in court transcripts, if you want third party details on what happened. The only public spectacle I’ve created that can said to not involve any kind of technical action was my Twitter ads thing, which to be honest was still pretty fucking brilliant.
The hack that got me busted is hardly my only claim to fame. Years before being indicted by the feds (and years before you had done anything related to racial activism), I was being quoted about the Jewish control over finance in articles related to trolling in the New York Times magazine. Before Heimbach was doing his white student union, my racist podcast with tens of thousands of viewers was getting attacked in magazines like Fortune. You are the self-promoting recent arrival, not me. I typically downplay my involvement. You don’t even know how many sites depend on me.
I was responsible for dozens of high profile hacks– I selectively disclosed a bug in LJ (biggest social media site in the world at that time, in 2006) to my hacker crew that lead to widespread posting of fake suicide notes on livejournals. I was part of doing all sorts of clever and funny things to Freenode. I removed every faggot book on Amazon from their search rankings, to a torrential rain of sodomite tears. I have a long and storied history that extends before and after my false arrest, up to and including printing millions of leaflets on other people’s printers.
If you had the kind of mind that would be able to think of any of this stuff you would have already been doing it bro. You’re a PHP monkey, not a hacker. Your attempt to pretend your information security accolades exceed mine is a form of laughable fraud, Parrott. You have no references in that sphere, while my public ones are far too numerous to list in two paragraphs. My private ones filled a multi-page CV once, back when I was actually employed in that industry which you are not a part of.
This is the underlying issue with you. When confronted with sane, rational criticisms of your actions, from interacting with law enforcement authorities to marching around with drug addled street thugs and obvious informants in stahlhelms, you respond with abject histrionics, deflections, and lies. Now you are curiously allying yourselves with the establishment media, feds, and the SPLC against the most censored publication in history.
It’s very curious that you have managed to have absolutely zero trouble with law enforcement. I started talking about Jews in public in 2006 (far before your partner was shilling for Israel) and after I got good at it they tried to frame me for terrorism so the FBI could have pretext to drop my name to Jewish groups, and when that showed no sign of stopping me they falsely indicted me, arrested me, bulldozed my home, and tortured me. You seem to have had no trouble advocating for neo-Nazi anti-racist Russian Orthodox Christian feminist communist anti-Americanism alongside the Oxycontin romper stomper crews. This, given your other behaviors, is pretty suspect.
FYI, your covenant partner NSM (who also keep lists) have been named specifically in the FBI false flag terror attack against a train in rural Nebraska. You know, the one that was done in total silence with no injuries and only a brief train stop, and that people only found out about because Jewish advocacy groups have PACER alerts for terms like Nazi and white supremacist? Can you imagine if the feds arrested a real white supremacist terrorist? There would be nationwide wall to wall coverage of their victorious press conference. Why would the feds have him put business cards from groups like the NSM in his wallet, do you think? If you can’t see what is happening you’re an absolute drooling retard.
Parrott, I understand you are feeling enormous pressure and having some sort of emotional issues as a result. Nothing else could possibly explain this latest meltdown over a post you or TWP weren’t even cited in. Nobody would blame you if you found something else to do for a while. I understand that you and your partner are much newer arrivals to realtalk than I and have not found a lot of success in it. We’d be happy to help you think of ways you could act that don’t involve risky behaviors with questionable individuals. If you come to your senses, you’ll be welcomed back into our movement. Until then, have fun in your ghetto full of degenerates that think it’s okay to talk to police. I’m sure you’ll have a lot of fun in your special outfits.